Slut.wtf

But, of course, as defined , pedophilia is incorrect; but besides this, https://slut.wtf/ this is evil. In a deep alarming trend over the past few decades, the pedophilia apologists tried to crush the condemnation of this terrible crime and criminal representations. They are very wrong. That is why.

Preliminary notes, july 13, 2019, i wrote the first project of the next essay on the horror of pedophilia at the end of 2016 or at the very beginning of 2017 and published it according to medium and quora, from whom it received rather a lot of attention. Since i deleted my accounts on the proposed sites last winter, this essay (and gambling others) was not available. But my goal, so that this is gambling in other essays in order to continue to circulate, so i will publish them here in my blog. The next essay, namely, is perceived by a serious person in the light of jeffrey epstein improglyio. It was, rather, a long -standing excitement for applied ethics as a whole, along with (for me) an incredibly incredible fact that people protect pedophiles. (As in the event with the philosopher g.E. Moore, in most of my philosophical letters, mainly in response to the absurd sentences that other people occupy.) When i first encountered this rhetorical phenomenon in 2002, when the pedophiles first went down to wikipedia i was just not able to believe in modern. My naive distrust disappeared through repeated clashes with pedophiles due to wikipedia. Meanwhile, i came to the conclusion that i was obliged to make at least some kind of medicine in this kind, so i reported about the pages of pedophilia wikimedia commons in the fbi in 2010 (which i did not do that i know). Absolutely everything that is said, this is hardly a more domestic reason than any other - in applied ethics. I also wrote about the evil of murder, racism, anti -vitism (my neologism), censorship, safety disabilities and other topics in applied ethics. I especially like my essay about "our moral abyss." 

I slightly rewrote the essay and watched it with some answers that i made for reviews with real, live pedophiles (they are on the internet and online and, by the way, quite shamelessly), which i hope will clarify my arguments. 

Updated again on december 6, 2019. My goal is to protect the thesis that pedophilia in both senses is not an ordinary "bad", but also deeply angry. It is not the thesis of neither psychology, nor about the law, but instead of morality. Children below the age of consent). This is a clinical definition. At the same time, we often use the word more talkatively to mean (b) actual sex with children, then there is absolutely everything that is more correctly described as sexy violence against descendants or this is to say the same) rape of the child. 1 

This upset how badly evil pedophilia seems to be understood. When i first sat down to write this essay, i was shocked by how little was available through the world wide web, explaining for what reasons this evil is. Wanting to help my goal to clarify this, starting with (b) actual sex with children. The evil of this act is easier to explain, and in displeasure on criminal representations, it actually depends on the evil of the act. 

The moral horror of children's rape 

raping of children2 is a terrible evil, because it injures the child forever. In connection with ours, you can compare with the torture and rape of adults; even as soon as the act ended, he continues to injure. This fills the child with undeserved shame and low self -esteem once and for all. For many surviving adults, such pain becomes so unbearable that other measures take everyday life. The specified can forever change the understanding of the child of sex. Some suffer, and this is the right word, from hypersexuality (sometimes called “nymphomania”), and some become completely closed to us sexual relations. It is terrible that this also does the victims more likely to become rapists when they grow up, which they call exactly what was called a "cycle of abuse." 

Sexual violence against children is an act, so destructive and humiliating, and also humiliating, meanwhile, so shocking selfish that it is worthy, so that it was called evil, suddenly something evil: for a number of moments adult pleasure causes an injury for life. 

Moral horror, physical shock and pain, the act itself is often inferior to the life of psychological sentiments and dysfunctions. The act of sexual violence against children is terribly harmful. This is an act, so destructive and humiliating, and in the meantime, so amazingly selfish that it deserves that in order to call it evil, suddenly something is evil: for most moments of pleasure, the adult causes injury forever.3 

The main rule is too much - and forcibly say that anyone who intends to evaluate the moral of sexual violence against children, without discussing the terrible facts about these consequences, is an omission, perpetuating evil. The correct moral assessment of the rape of a child absolutely requires opposition to his terrifying consequences. That's why we must condemn those supporters of pedophiles who want to talk only about the positive experience with the offspring, if they were frankly possible, and that they do not discuss more typical and probable injuries that the act causes. Even in the case when the probability of injury was relatively insignificant, the seriousness of the harm happens so extremely that the act is completely not justified. The injury caused by children as a result of rape is such a factor that it is able to provoke a dissociative disorder of identity (once known as “many personality disorder”). 

In any case, each discussion of the subject must make surely let the intimate with minor children - terrible evil and unbearable. Unfortunately, ignorance meant that pedophilia was not clear enough to be a terrible evil that it is. But no matter how definite, the shameless defenders of pedophilia really exist and can be found throughout the internet, how i will explain below (and, i am afraid how to meet the comments of this essay in the category of comments; but i answer the point in each case) . So, for the sake of those who are quite captivated in this matter, he must ensure that the rest carry out this operation quite clearly. It is incorrect with transformed children only when the son or daughter does not agree. ” We can answer that legally children, of course, are not able to agree. Sex with predominant children day and night should be considered rape. This is not surprising: the offspring are not able to agree, due to the fact that people do not know the nature of intimate contact or its consequences. But i am the brain that the most powerful answer is this: the injury described above will happen, whether the “consent” will seem to be “consent” by the child. Everyone who uses such phrases as if a child agrees ”, uses the language of the apologies of pedophilia and is highly suspicious. As a result, this is the design of many confirmed, repeating pedophiles to take care of children in order to win their “consent”. No person should pay tribute to what the child speaks in such a disgusting situation; the fault is also significantly reduced to rape of an adult, as in the event when the child says “no, and fights with. In a subtle way and my priority to give them a hat here. 4 although they agree that the rape of the child has terrible consequences, they insist that the link to these circumstances is not necessary to identify, so this is evil. To bring this moment, i click - how the eldest child is “in love” with an adult, and after long departures, she is just starting to be subjected to serious violence, believing that he enjoys this, as the asteroid destroyed the world. There were no bad consequences in that place. So, was there any harm to the girl? The act itself is harmful, regardless of the consequences. We, assuming the agricultural prospect of god's flight to the situation, cannot take into account the consequences, because we are considering the fact that to universal joy, briefly) happened; imagine that the parents of the young lady in heaven, because the world has left), given this. They can tremble on her behalf. It may not be significant what her attitude was sometimes immediately injured by her. To the question, as a result of which this is wrong? " They answer: "this is undoubted like that." This, without any reason, is the approach of deontologists to mass moral issues: correctly and wrong, for example, do not always depend on the consequences, it is not difficult to understand that sex is incorrect if a person is not sufficiently mature for consent. 

as deontologists can also indicate, because of this, the law punishes the law of rape regardless of the actual consequences, finally. Children can be physically wounded as a result of the floor, there are stories when schoolchildren died from injuries obtained as a result of abuse. This can lead to pregnancy among the pubescent heifers at the age of 11 or 12 years. Spp can contract like boys, completely girls, what is the horror. Children's rape - the most common egregious violations of parents' rights to educate their beloved children, which they consider necessary. This deeply damages friends and personal life. And also, this contradicts the law, and the laws on the age level of consent exist for very good reasons, as i hope, i explained. There is a measurement of evil rape, which mentions a special mention: as after with young women, children can be enslaved and are worth sex in many countries.Which, however, the practice of raping heirs and the protection of pedophilia have terrible consequences of supporting this slave trade. It is estimated that millions of children are a many young teenagers, they are affected by sexual slavery, incorrectly described as “prostitution”, from year to year in america and 2 million around the world. 

Therefore, the normalization of pedophilia supports not only individual cases of rape of children, but also an entire sexual trade industry for $ 99 billion annually; compare the film industry that has earned 43 billion usd in the united states in 2017. We are not only about an individual crime, but also organized crime. Some evil people are not primitively rape of children: they make companies to purchase and sell children for sex. This, of course, exacerbates what has long been unthinkable horror. 

But it becomes even worse. There are a number of circumstances in which children's sex is not only among the lower classes, as well as one of the most wealthy and most powerful echelons. It is only necessary to investigate the cases of jeffrey epstein, jimmy savill, the nxivm cult, the den pedophila rings and other painful addictions. A criminal and moral question. But now i have understood that there is one of the very pressing civil problems of our age. It is fundamentally important that we do not justify pedophilia. We must hurry to understand this for the terrible evil that the beast is. Children better call “ebophilia” and “efebophilia” based on age. This difference can be made, but narrowing the scale of the term has a small moral import. That is why the word "pedophilia" as before is used as a general term. This applies to the crime of sex with the too yououng state. Let's be completely clear. Moral horror can attach as much or almost as much as intimacy with adolescents as with kids. One former criminal admitted, in response to this page, he applied, he applied with the life of a 16-year-old girl. A sufficient number of women boldly showed the great harm done by him, when they were girls -teenage, jeffrey epstein and his elite personnel of rapists (we are still, as of 2021, we do not know exactly who they are). The assumption on the topic, something that happens to them is not too bad to be knocked down with a brush of “pedophilia”, is under contempt. Writers ask for everyone to use the words “pedophilia” and “pedophile” according to the feelings determined by psychiatrists. But also, as we can not tell anyone our daily use of “fruits” on tomatoes, although biologists tell us that other measures are fruit, because you can continue to use these words in their popular feelings. 

As a philosopher, in other words, someone who is trained in determining concepts and argument about everything, how much to apply the words, i want to advise the opposite: you can and must continue to use such words as always, at least , most contexts. In a similar popular sense, pedophiles are one who sexually offends the kids either who tries to do this, or whoever wants. To be clear, i do not say that it should be a scientific or clinical use of terms. I say that the daily use that i discuss here and which catalogs in many definitions of the dictionary does not need to reflect clinical use. Grade. Pedophilia is the best example: it was medicated, and all the same, obviously, this is terribly incorrect attitude that needs to be printed. Meet with children. Such a moment is also moral evil. 

Some are trying to undermine a simple statement that this "clinical state" is evil. They do because the fact that psychologists and some are treated, pedophilia suggests that, since pedophilia is thoughtful, just a state of health, a porn tuning is not a peculiarity for a moral assessment. This argument is as much as you see in reality it serves better as the restoration of the premise; in other words, the drug of the state certainly does not exclude its moral assessment. Pedophilia is the best example: it turned out to be medicated, and yet, obviously, this is terribly incorrect attitude, which must be printed. The fact that psychiatrists who do everything necessary to eliminate the condition is to accept what the unbiased position means is hardly necessary that we also need to do this. Speaking here: desire and imagination of sex with children, also called rape children. The word for such thoughts is a criminal idea, since psychiatrists sometimes speak of a murderous idea. The subperson of people who write down such an object are a less popular position - to say that a desire, but not exclusively an act is evil. But in reality, most of the men are completely not averse to putting on him “evil”.Polls are not available, but, of course, the vast majority of guys will find pedophile options, like “evil”. The children are evil. However, this puts this into a sobering context, the practice of another, frankly strange and alarming, in order to consider pedophilia as just a mental disorder, like it is hardly a scourge of our society for ordinary users. Let's give that pedophilia, in the sense of striving for fucking with children, is indeed a mental disorder; in this seems to be nothing well ordered. But the mass simply did not give a damn about the slightest degree that a mental disorder is, that is, it does not scare people that the surface is not too much with pedophile brains, besides the fact that such people are dangerous for our kids. Pedophilia as a disorder as such, rightly rightly considers us a threat, and this is a monstrous threat that there is evil. 

So, yes, well discovered, pedophilia is a disorder. But this is not incompatible with the statement that we condemn him as something rather evil, and not just a clinical state, for example, high blood pressure. I do this, condemn this, like all of us. Break small children. Rather, i put the priorities of the health of families and communities, much higher than any pain that is ready to cause the illegal desire of such a person. In fact, the priority of the first is much more that i can mention that the only important reason that most of us need to protect the pedophile’s mental health is that, thanks to the concern, we may prevent erotic violence against children. There is no other important reason. Sometimes it is more than a strong moral condemnation, but not sympathy, motivates pedophiles to more effectively eliminate their moods. Rap women. They fantasize about this, they watch sex videos of rape, they could closely approach. Some have already done this, despite the fact that others have never done this. What is such an individual rape. This is a label that we are able to place under the extreme form of the dsm-5 category, sexual sadism. Currently, if pedophilia is a mental disorder, i am a brain that we can say with confidence that ripfilia is also alone. Of course, to be an irapophyl can cause a large mental pain; it should still be. But, in such a situation, who care about whom: rape or women who are able to be in danger from rape? Obviously, the last, even if rape never acted in their desires. And the rape is a criminal idea, of course: is it not in the era in which the establishment is opposed by the “culture of rape”, we believe that this is deeply evil? 

We are worried about violations of innocent children less than our company is baking about violation of wilting skin? He will say smug, you too little obvious objection: how does pedophilia happen evil if such is outside the human control? The short answer is that its use is not so outside the human control. But first, my task is to support a little. Do this, and similarly, when you should not do something, you will have to be free so as not to succumb to it. So if no one can fail to do some business, then our company cannot say which you should not do this; if we must restrain ourselves, then this should be the moment when we are able to limit ourselves. Well, in this case, we are ready to be obliged to do something outside our government? Such a nuance that pedophiles will not be able to control their conditions, these claims are sometimes used to make a definitely false conclusion that pedophilia, in a psychiatric sense, is not bad. 

, Given the above, i deny the premise. I argue that pedophilia as well as the desire to play with children can be controlled. 

Alcoholism is also a mental dysfunction, and it can be controlled, let it be with big problems. This is how to explain this i claim that alcoholism is possible very, very morally bad, in this sense. (Keep in mind, many recovering alcoholics sincerely agree with me about this.) Everyone understands that alcoholism is addiction, and i can admit that it shows the characteristics of the disease. But this does not exempt anyone who was captured by this dependence on any moral obligations. In addition to customers, few people object to a good council, which we should not allow ourselves to succumb to this terrible swamp, before the dependence will become so bad. Indeed, our company is a huge obligation in order to avoid this, especially if others in everyday family were alcoholics. Even when our company is not able to easily stop our family from drinking as soon as we dependent, we are able to stop our device from an excess, if a person is not dependent.This is a deep feature of the modern world as moral creatures with free will. Nevertheless, even then we carry a very heavy burden, and their work is a moral burden, what besides that? With addiction. Perhaps we cannot be accused if we are genetically predisposed to such dependence; but there are people with this hereditary predisposition, which never concern alcohol for the reason. The store has free will. When we go out of addiction, we will carry this burden until the dependence is struck by us. Then we will still bear the burden in order not to allow ourselves to plunge into it. To deny these banality, it means to deny both the general experience and the reality of free will. This fact is a deep feature of our being as moral beings with free will; before you should not be transmitted slightly, all the more fired. This is completely unrealistic, and also cynical and corrupting to deny the flexibility of desire. Ultimately, great morality and psychiatry, as well as rehabilitation in criminal justice, can be associated with a change in unwanted desires. To consider instincts and coercion as unchanging forces of nature, practically delete from moral improvement, psychiatric recovery and criminal rehabilitation. They crawl, as a breakdown, they can be considered simple opportunities. We consider them available, briefly, thinking. If there is enough taboo, murders, incest or pronouncing certain prohibited expressions and thoughts, many people will immediately discard this idea and intention has little chance of germinating. 

Suppose that there is a citizen who, for some reason, is unusually weak self-control. If this person will be in order to, he does not have filters to curb him; it never occurred to him that his application would not reject this. Instead of these formalities, he takes care of his desire. He thinks about it. He considers and discusses with himself; he imagines; he plans, but without affecting plans. 

Suppose that every person is a pedophile. 

Pedofil finally decides that he has a disease, that it can be wrong for him to have such desires. Is such people not morally guilty, stupid, at least, if not really angry, in order to allow such desires to conduct uncontrolled? Why is there no use? Think about every illegal or undesirable desire that you might have in the past dessert, game time, fb and vk, porn, cigarettes, alcohol, drugs or some kind of any, no matter what your vice. It is possible to prevent yourself from please yourself with bad habits, especially if they get used to it very much. But did you forget, if you have developed these bad habits, and if you are much easier to anticipate them? Not simple assert what another is; explain extremely carefully how it differs. This is wrong. If he or she never indulges in desire, why believe that a simple desire is bad? Wouldn't people be horrified by a large person with poor self -control, who admitted that the other day he began to constantly take care of the violence of women? Defenders believe that help right away. Thoughts, of course, are bad, since the very people, it is not sufficiently self -control to streamline their fantasies, sometimes does not quite have enough self -control to restrain the behavior to which the desire leads. People do not leave children alone with people that they admit that they have pedophile desires, since desires can lead to action. 

Has there is a simple answer. The desire is terrible, due to the fact that this can lead to a terrible action. Have we never had a trembling from a large representative with poor self -control, who admitted who recently began to constantly think about the rape of women? Of course, i only need it. So why? Because he could begin to act on our thoughts. Should we ignore his desires, since they simply want ”? 

Is this the main reason, so pedophilia in the clinical sense is terribly evil: it can, and sometimes lead to terribly evil action. It is idle and saborest to insist that, in the end, such a step can not lead to this action. A person who allows such an angry desire to conduct a expectation - and to grow for this very reason demonstrated low control. The risk is invaluable, all this is the risk of great evil. 

Let me consider one final answer. That kohl claims that this desire has, but how it is completely under the control that the partner never raped the baby and only if he fantasizes. Setting aside fears about risk, undoubtedly, just fantasizing anyone does not harm anyone. 

Well, no, it is not fantasy in itself, which makes the pedophilia so evil. This is, first of all, the risk.Anyone who, to such an extent, does not control, which allows these feelings to pass in their abilities, is a risk, as far as we know the rest, regardless because its application has the authority to say. And even despite the fact that fantasy, considered by itself (excluding its consequences), may not to assure anyone, this, of course, increases the risk. 

Pedophile feelings have other harmful consequences. They can force someone to look for child pornography, which creates a market for the actual rape of children. Even the painted corruption of children can increase the objective opportunity for the desire of a real thing, thereby creating the market. In the end, if the pedophile loves to look at the drawn pictures of the babies who molested, of course, he or she is able to extract much more excitement from real photographs. 

This is also an undesirable desire, because the pedophile can no longer act on this. For this reason, in addition to terribly evil, it is also irrational. Imagine that you are trying to have a normal relationship with you, and even adults, especially adults with offspring, if someone regularly imagines the violence and rape of children. Ideas and thoughts have deep consequences for character. What kind of person you should be and you can, in the case when you often allow yourself to claim a deliberate violation of the bodies of innocent, trusting children? It has real moral horror, horror, completely independent of external effects. In this section, i argued that pedophilia, considered simply an attraction to sex with the guys, is terribly evil. But i do not say that psychiatrists, clergy or others who function directly with pedophiles, usually as condemning as possible. I have no opinion because of this; i cumak that psychiatrists should be engaged in the fact that using the services of their clinical experience, of course, reduces the disorder the most elite and very, remaining, remaining, of course, 5 

Stop the apology of pedophilia 

Online discounts on pedophilia should certainly clarify how much the abuse of an evil child is. So they are? Too always they are not done. A more typical narrative remains that pedophilia is a sense, and impressions cannot be controlled, therefore, unpleasant pedophiles are “virtuous pedophiles”, in that oull dump truck. The horrors of abuse and the aspect that just feeling can and can very much lead to abuse, are absolutely not mentioned or pass in a few minutes. This popular narrative is not only wrong, for the reasons that i have already explained, this event is also very dangerous. 

Including those who are in the fact that the rape of a child is a great evil can involuntarily contribute to this problem narrative, when they say, as if pedophile desires were unchanging facts of nature. When behavior seems to arise from a desire, especially, especially when it is a psychiatric diagnosis, modern commentators and enough psychiatrists are in a sad habit of treating desire or diagnosis as a morally neutral state of health, for which “the patient does not answer. In his free will there is a funny thing, the more often we are sure that something is subject to control, the more serious control over it. On the contrary, the more willing we believe that something is wrong, the less we are inclined to practice with yours. As if faith in free will gives everyone https://slut.wtf free will, however, faith in some ability gives us a willingness to show it. On the contrary, the rejection of faith in free will leads to the fact that your motivation acts contrary to your current inclinations. The problem of pedophilia. It would be like to tell alcoholics how they are not responsible when they are alcoholics and are not able to free themselves from the most eager alcohol, as if their coercion were doomed to no less strong, as in the strongest. If they believed in ours, then why are they already trying to defeat their addiction? If the rest of the users believed in this, why do people first of all try to confront slipping into alcoholism? Imagine that you are saying something like that, again, these “rape”: “it is a shame that gembler will be able to rape women with severe coercion. However, this is not your fault, due to the fact that it is just a mood and wishes outside your control. Still, now that you have, assure you that you do not act. ” We are not able to imagine that no one with such a smug attitude in our time #metoo. Why maintain such a location to someone who wants to rape children? Again, children are less worthy of protection than ladies? This morally exaggerating message is repeated in absolutely all parts of our decadent culture, which rejects personal responsibility. Addicts hear and obey everywhere.

It is also necessary for free message, many pedophiles consider their condition simply “additional sexual orientation”, which can be responsible for responsibly (in other words in fantasies). You can see the sympathetic group almost everything on the internet, including pedophilia. I am sorry to report that the propagandists of pedophilia online are active and enthusiastic. 

Propaganda made by pedophiles and on their behalf is anxious. Consider: 

- During the discussions of pedophilia, the press is dominated by the requests that our confectioners should “understand” pedophiles in the first place. Somehow it will make children safer. Such articles rarely devote enough time to the risk of abuse, and they, of course, no longer take the position that pedophilia is evil. Many read about the north american association of love people, or nambla, which still: there is actually online. Perhaps the most popular member of namble is its co-founder, poet poet allen ginzberg, and the organization was protected by aclu. It is incredible that electric- "activists" for within for within for within within for for for within in in the course for within the course for during for within for for for within for within на протяжениив течениина протяжениив течениина протяжениив течениина протяжениив течении десятилетий спорили о «реформе возраста согласия», словно бы пропаганда отменить , вызываемый различными the pathogenic bacteria of terrible crimes that are easy to imagine, somehow “progressive”. Other groups on the internet include “virtuous pedophiles” and “celibate pedophiles” who collect it with business to protect the non -membrane of pedophiles through the world wide web. Pedophiles simply have another “sexual orientation”- a position that was discussed at least in the same college course. "Crime without casualties." Do not take it to your mind, what is depicted is for any decent spectators the first of the most disgusting crimes, worse than ordinary rape, because it is rape of children. Do not take into the head that the consumers of such images are pedophiles that bring great pleasure from fantasies about the commission of this crime, and that later they must continue to keep their family from the implementation of such a crime. Wikipedia is noteworthy in detail the state of the law in the world, which regulates the clearly drawn erotic violence against children. 6 - in this case, there is a tone. The adopted tone is almost always high, as if the defenders of pedophiles were better, and smarter, this and i. Writers condescendingly reproach society when they could not believe that the unfortunate, long -suffering pedophiles are indeed pranks. One german program considers pedophiles as "victims, but not offenders." It seems that they mock: - that our company is not in the know scientific, for the sake of our hatred of deep moral evil and social cancer; the meaning implies that pedophilia can become a matter of clinical study and treatment, neither in life of a non -moral assessment that would be safely unscientific and reactionary. Of course, a true detailed consultation for this is reduced to how to laugh in contempt for specific deep propaganda. The main reason that we, as a society, should insist that pedophilia is a criminal idea, and among other things, what is terribly evil: we must take a firm opposition to people who are sincerely consciously, try to normalize it. If it is normalized, this situation will encourage so many weak and evil to pamper their desires. In fact, to the extent, in it he has long been normalized, weak and ill -fated already presented their needs and form the listed with a destructive frequency. 

Pedophilia should not be normalized to anyone. Do not receive works about calling it evil; we need to call it evil; we prevent the spread of this evil, identifying money and the carrier, as such. All this is fine, but by fact few people will admit that it will be weak volitional, and abuse always wears a mask of lies-criminal pedophiles, does not differ in any way from such an assessment. Having stolled with criminal charges, many insulting pedophiles will pretend to be “virtuous”. Ignoring any of their conversations about virtuous pedophilia, some of the activists and researchers -activists who write on this issue, it seems, do not seek to mention vicious pedophiles. Thanks to this, they amaze me as iuroko, but, as expected, take into account what they protect, is non -erealist and irrationally.A more realistic and rational look is that the world is quite filled with weak people, and with much more malicious people than appear on the surface and porn actresses so easily indulge their desires when the opportunity is formed. Indeed, very often they are struggling to give themselves opportunities. If there is one thing that is worthy of that in order to be taboo. Pedophilia is no longer required to be normalized. Have no works about calling it evil; it is important that we call it evil; we prevent the spread of this evil, identifying money and the carrier, as such. Who commented on the average copy of the above article. I do not turn on the answers of pedophiles, because i did not save copies of what they wrote when i left wednesday. 

Answer #1 

This is answered by the pedophile's teenage self -study, who said that in life he did not act on his feelings, and what useful thing i was very vile for the fact that he lacked sympathy for his difficult position. Who can be embarrassed as you will never be. I have no desire to have “sympathy” for pedophiles, more than i want to have sympathy for rapists. Frankly, i am the brain that the molestation of the child is much worse than the rape of adults; this is a truly terrible crime. “The irregular attractions of none of us are no more legal than in order to no more empathy than the male gender, they want to forcibly rape the ladies, but to restrain themselves.” The only preference to empathize with the pedophilia of such a person is to prevent crime; and how the crime is prevented by empathy is not to force the criminal (or potential criminal) to feel healthy and full of strength in their criminal thinking, but also to find out their models, motives and other objects that allow us (a ) catch and punish criminals and (b) aggressively prevent the actual cruel work with the guys. A little wrong, but terribly evil (and maybe they make them read the essay that i wrote, demonstrating an excellent understanding of these goals and (b) immediately resort to qualified help from a doctor who agreed with me that pedophile desires should be regarded as criminal an idea, in order to eliminate them more. Explain how evil pedophilia. I also carefully and patiently explained why the murder is incorrect, and not a single person accused me of complacency. This is because normal users do not think that the wallpaper especially great, since young ladies do not commit crimes. For modern people, this is just a basic line. And i do not mean a little either in a poor and sharp path (for example, drug abuse, it seems, for most people), but right in the black route your heart. Pedophiles are evil. Pussy is not worth sympathy. They have a need for treatment, since the disadvantaged could use rehabilitation, not because we are sorry for pedophiles (or masters), but because society is desperate to refrain from our own evil behavior. And the idea that pedophilia is a sexual orientation that must be normalized is terribly and obscene abroad. He himself as a european graduate student in the humanities who thought that he was smart, publishing sophistic answers to arguments in this essay. These are my refutations. 

Matt, as you say as an apologist for pedophilia, and if you talk with one who believes pedophilia (in both senses determined in this initial essay), this is evil, you exclude trust or authority. Therefore, after the customer gets a tone of condescension, you just come across ridiculous. I still laugh at you; you deserve ridicule and contempt. And exactly so i am not going to give answers to your stupid attempts to zingers; they also force you to look extremely effective. 

We will give several answers: 

I wrote: “small minor people are no more legal than and no more than empathy than the male sex, they want to rape ladies but to limit yourself. "Do you suggest that the pedophile is not able to control its steps? You have already argued that the wallpaper is capable of in the client previous article. ” 

“Rape” -defined, say, as an exceptional or predominant desire to rape women, for example, as legal as pedophilia, as well, determined by the method of children. So, imagine that someone came up with “without the influence of rape, attracted people” or norap, and said that different things about their desire to rape the fair sex that you are talking about attraction to the kids. Chicks just need help; young ladies cannot be subjected to ostracism; the hairs remove "understood"; do not judge them as potential rapists, since the overwhelming number of which is not rape; and t.D. Well, damn you see that to say these rarities in defense of the fictional category of norap does not differ from this to say similar furniture in defense of the nominal nominal (that is, pedophiles). Moreover, the protection of ripfilia is completely illegal, in addition, we suggest that the protection of pedophilia is completely illegal. Control yourself. But i say more than they can prevent themselves to rape children. In addition, i say that the models bear a heavy burden to deny and get rid of their desire to rape children, that the images were forced to deny and suppress when if it was launched. Instead, they went with the data. He “plays” with fire in order to indulge in potential criminals, saying that their lust to rape children is a sexual orientation ”, a flush with heterosexuality or homosexuality, saying that there is nothing illegal in dreams, etc. Imagine a group of people, the worst of the techniques are ordinary rapists who say: “there is nothing morally wrong with people who can only choose the fantasies of rape. They are not unable to control themselves. We are forced to understand them. Some girls actually secretly want them to be raped, you are in the know, of course, we claim that rape is very, very wrong. (In addition, undoubtedly, for users, what is believed that this kind is not scary, right?) ”You are an idiot. Your bias replacing their people who commit terrible crimes, forced you to understand the main reasoning. I literally have opinions about the best way to rehabilitate pedophiles. I know that i am not a psychologist, so i am not at all decorated on such things. But i have an attitude to social morals: this should never have existed an acceptable part of society in order to encourage adults to accept their attractiveness to children. More precisely, and should remain one of the the most most prose strong taboos that we live. I do not know or especially take care that therapists speak pedophiles in their therapy sessions. Or addicts: get rid of desire. In this regard, this is very, it differs from the purpose of treatment for homosexuals. Most people believe that our company cannot try to cure "homosexuals; i am a person who thinks that our employees should not. In this regard, homosexuality can be considered as sexual orientation, while pedophilia and ripfilia are not possible. In the same way, the tasting of wines and the point of whiskey can be studied as more or less useful games; alcoholism is not considered, and alcoholics bear a heavy burden to lose their coercion.